DISCOVER

Full Circle Burn Care Solutions

Prepare the burn site.
Protect from infection.
Progress to healing.

 

"*" indicates required fields

Zip Code*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Barriers to burn healing

Prepare the burn site: Overcoming necrotic tissue

Necrotic tissue provides a food source for a variety of bacteria, progressing quickly to infection if not managed appropriately.

Protect from infection: Overcoming infection

Infections in burn wounds can lead to a delay in epidermal maturation, longer hospitalization, and an increase in overall treatment cost.

Progress to healing: Overcoming permanent scarring

Burns can result in severe psychological and emotional distress because of long-term hospitalization, scarring, and deformity.

Promote wound healing with our advanced burn management portfolio

west_white_24dp
east_white_24dp

Case studies

Connect with us

Share your email address for more information about how Smith+Nephew can help improve your facility with advanced burn management.

"*" indicates required fields

Location*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Burn Master Visual Aid (MVA)

Strategic responses to advanced burn management

*n=37; dressing retention was 1.92x longer.
**In a pragmatic, randomized, controlled, superiority trial. p=0.001; n=359. Estimated cost savings vs standard preventive care alone; n=359.

***Compared to previous dressings. Ambispective (retrospective and prospective) observational study. 1.66 ALLEVYN LIFE Dressings vs 3.14 previous dressings (foams or gelling fibres); n=94; p<0.001). €11.46 ALLEVYN LIFE Dressings vs €27.75 previous dressings (foams or gelling fibres); n=94; p<0.001).

****n=38. Time saving based on previous dressing, estimated for 169 patients requiring ≥3 visits per week.

  1. Caputo WJ, Beggs DJ, DeFede JL, Simm L, Dharma H. A prospective randomised controlled clinical trial comparing hydrosurgery debridement with conventional surgical debridement in lower extremity ulcers. Int Wound J. 2008;5(2):288-294.
  2. Liu J, Ko JH, Secretov E, et al. Comparing the hydrosurgery system to conventional debridement techniques for the treatment of delayed healing wounds: a prospective, randomised clinical trial to investigate clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Int Wound J. 2015;12(4):456-461. 
  3. McAleer JP, Kaplan EM, Perisich G, Axman W. A Prospective Randomized Study Evaluating the Time Efficiency of the VERSAJET™ Hydrosurgery System and Traditional Wound Debridement. Poster presented at: ACFAS 2005; New Orleans, LA. 
  4. Granick MS, Posnett J, Jacoby M, Noruthun S, Ganchi PA, Datiashvili RO. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a high-powered parallel waterjet for wound debridement. Wound Repair Regen. 2006;14:394-397. 
  5. Mosti G, Maltaliano V. The debridement of chronic leg ulcers by means of a new, fluidjet-based device. Wounds. 2006;18:227-237. 
  6. James CV, Patel M, Ilonzo N, et al. Hydrosurgical debridement use associated with decreased surgical site-related readmissions: a retrospective analysis. Wounds. 2021;33 (6):139-142. 
  7. Rennekampff HA, Schaller HE, Wisser D, Tanenhaus M. Debridement of Burn Wounds with a Water Jet Surgical Tool. Burns. 2006;32(1):64 – 69. 
  8. Granick M, Boykin J, Gamelli R, Schultz G, Tenenhaus M. Toward a common language: surgical wound bed preparation and debridement. Wound Repair Regen. 2006;14:S1-S10. 
  9. Vanwijck R, Kaba L, Boland S, Gonzales y Azero M, Delange A, Tourbach S. Immediate skin grafting of sub-acute and chronic wounds debrided by hydrosurgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:544-549. 
  10. Shi L, Carson D. Collagenase Santyl ointment: a selective agent for wound debridement. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009;36(6 Suppl):S12-S16. doi:10.1097/WON.0b013e3181bfdd1a. 
  11. Collagenase SANTYL Ointment [prescribing information]. Fort Worth, TX: Smith & Nephew, Inc.; 2018. 
  12. Pham CH, Collier ZJ, Fang M. Howell A. Gillenwater TJ. The role of collagenase ointment in acute burns: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Wound Care. 2019 Feb 1:28(Sup2I:S9-15. 
  13. Herman, I. Stimulation of human keratinocyte migration and proliferation in vitro: insights into the cellular responses to injury and wound healing. Wounds. 1996; 8:33-40. 
  14. Riley et al. Collagenase promotes the cellular responses to injury and wound healing in vivo. J Burns Wounds. 2005; 4:112-124. 
  15. Shi et al. Degradation of human collagen isoforms by Clostridium collagenase and the effects of degradation products on cell migration. Int Wound J. 2010; 7: 87-95. 
  16. Sheets AR, Demidova-Rice TN, Shi L, Ronfard V, Grover KV, Herman IM (2016) Identification and Characterization of Novel Matrix-Derived Bioactive Peptides: A Role for Collagenase from Santyl® Ointment in Post-Debridement Wound Healing? PLoS ONE 11(7): e0159598. 
  17. Frederick RE, Bearden R, Jovanovic A, Jacobson N, Sood R, Dhall S. Clostridium Collagenase Impact on Zone of Stasis Stabilization and Transition to Healthy Tissue in Burns. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(16):8643. Published 2021 Aug 11. doi:10.3390/ijms22168643. 
  18. Wright JB et al. (1998) American Journal of Infection Control; 26(6): 572-577. 
  19. Wright JB et al. (1999) Am J Infect Control ;27:344-350. 
  20. Driffield, K; ACTICOAT Flex 3 has antimicrobial activity in 30 minutes, Data on file 0810018, Smith & Nephew. 
  21. Driffield, K; ACTICOAT Flex 7 has antimicrobial activity in 30 minutes, Data on file 0810014, Smith & Nephew. 
  22. 121. Daubney, L: Silver Release Testing of ACTICOAT Flex 3 Dressings. Report reference DS/08/078/R2. 
  23. Westaim Report ref #971030 The Antimicrobial Activity of Westaim’s Acticoat Silver Coated Dressing against Clinically Relevent Organisims over an Extended Period of time. 
  24. Driffield, K; Antimicrobial Activity of ACTICOAT Flex 3 against a Broad Spectrum of Wound Pathogens, Data on File reference 0810016. 
  25. Newton (2010) Reducing MRSA bacteraemias associated with wounds. Wounds uk, Vol 6, No 1. 
  26. Selcuk (2012) Comparison of the antibacterial effect of silver. Burns 38: 1204-1209. 
  27. Sibbald et al (2001) A screening evaluation of an ionised nanocrystalline silver dressing in chronic wound care. Ostomy Wound management 47 (10), 38-4. 
  28. Chopra (2007) Increasing use of silver-based products. Jnl. Anti Chem. 
  29. Strohal, R. et al. Nanocrystalline silver dressings as an efficient anti-MRSA barrier: a new solution to an increasing problem. J. Hosp. Infect. 60, 226–30 (2005). 
  30. Upton, D. and Solowiej, K. (2010). Pain and Stress as Contributors to Delayed Wound Healing. Journal of the Australian Wound Management Association, 2010;18: 3. 
  31. Cuttle L, Naidu S, Mill J, Hoskins W, Das K, Kimble RM. A retrospective cohort study of Acticoat versus Silvazine in a paediatric population. Burns. 2007;33(6):701 – 707. 
  32. Gago M, Garcia F, Gaztelu V, Verdu J, Lopez P, Nolasco A. A comparison of three silver-containing dressings in the treatment of infected, chronic wounds. Wounds. 2008;20(10):273 – 278. 
  33. Huang Y, Li X, Liao Z, et al. A randomized comparative trial between Acticoat and SD-Ag in the treatment of residual burn wounds, including safety analysis. Burns. 2007;33(2):161 – 166. 
  34. Gravante G, Caruso, R., Sorge, R., Nicoli, F., Gentile, P. and Cervelli, V. Nanocrystalline silver: a systematic review of randomized trials conducted on burned patients and an evidence-based assessment of potential advantages over older silver formulations. Annals of plastic surgery. 2009;63:201-205. 
  35. Tonkin C, Wood F. Nanocrystalline silver reduces the need for antibiotic therapy in burn wounds. Primary Intention. 2005;13(4):163 – 168. 
  36. Strand O, San Miguel L, Rowan S, Sahlqvist A. Retrospective comparison of two years in a paediatric burns unit, with and without ACTICOAT as a standard dressing. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2010;23(4):182 – 185. 
  37. Fong J, Wood F, Fowler B. A silver coated dressing reduces the incidence of early burn wound cellulitis and associated costs of inpatient treatment: Comparative patient care audits. Burns. 2005;31(5):562 – 567. 
  38. Peters DA, Verchere C. Healing at home: Comparing cohorts of children with medium-sized burns treated as outpatients with in-hospital applied ACTICOAT to those children treated as inpatients with silver sulfadiazine. J Burn Care & Research. 2006;27(2):198 – 201. 
  39. Demling RH, DeSanti L. The rate of re-epithelialization across meshed skin grafts is increased with exposure to silver. Burns. 2002;28(3):264 – 266. 
  40. Muangman P, Chuntrasakul C, Silthram S, et al. Comparison of Efficacy of 1% Silver Sulfadiazine and Acticoat for Treatment of Partial-Thickness Burn Wounds. J Med Assoc Thai. 2006;89(7):953 – 958. 
  41. Salgado RM, Bravo L, García M, Melchor JM, Krötzsch E. Histomorphometric analysis of early epithelialization and dermal changes in mid partial-thickness burn wounds in humans treated with porcine small intestinal submucosa and silver-containing hydrofiber. J Burn Care Res. 2014;35(5):e330-e337. 
  42. Cuenca-Pardo J, Peralta-Conde D. Quemaduras en cara ratada con escision temprana y cubiertas con matrix acelular (Face burns treated with early excision and covered with an acellular matrix). Cir Plast. 2011;21(1):11-19. 
  43. Glik J, Kawecki M, Kitala D, et al. A new option for definitive burn wound closure – pair matching type of retrospective case-control study of hand burns in the hospitalised patients group in the Dr Stanislaw Sakiel Centre for Burn Treatment between 2009 and 2015. Int Wound J. 2017;14:849-855.


For detailed product information, including indications for use, contraindications, warnings, and precautions, please consult each product’s Instructions for Use (IFU) prior to use. Products may not be available in all markets because product availability is subject to the regulatory and/or medical practices in individual markets. Please contact your Smith+Nephew representative or distributor if you have questions about the availability of Smith+Nephew products in your area.

Important Safety Information

Indications: Collagenase SANTYL Ointment (“SANTYL”) is a prescription-only medication indicated for debriding chronic dermal ulcers and severely burned areas. Contraindications: SANTYL is contraindicated in patients who have shown local or systemic hypersensitivity to collagenase. Warning and Precautions: The optimal pH range of collagenase is 6 to 8. Higher or lower pH conditions will decrease the enzyme’s activity and appropriate precautions should be taken. The enzymatic activity is also adversely affected by certain detergents, and heavy metal ions such as mercury and silver which are used in some antiseptics. As such, the wound should be properly cleansed prior to application of SANTYL. Debilitated patients should be closely monitored for systemic bacterial infections because of the theoretical possibility that debriding enzymes may increase the risk of bacteremia. A slight transient erythema has been noted occasionally in the surrounding tissue, particularly when SANTYL was not confined to the wound. SANTYL is not indicated for wound closure. Discontinue use of SANTYL after granulation tissue is well-established. Adverse Reactions: No allergic sensitivity or toxic reactions have been noted in clinical use when used as directed. The risk information provided herein is not comprehensive. For complete prescribing information, please refer to the accompanying PI or visit: https://sn-burn.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/SAPE72-38468_SANTYL-PI-2018-FINAL-APPROVED.pdf  You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to FDA. Visit MedWatch or call 1-800-FDA-1088.